i dont know why you call this site wikitopo it should be called
notopo. there is not a single topo for any of the crags i think could
be worth a visit,frustrating not only for me but also for others
visiting this site
| By Dan101 (in reply to Anonymous) | 2009-04-13 11:27:10 | reply |
Strange comment. OK - so only a limited number of areas are covered so far (I reckon this is going to change over time) but ultimately it is down to users of the site to build it's content If you don't want to help you don't have to but I don't see the point of winging about lack of content.
Fair point - The places listed in the Topo Library now each have a number next to them indicating the amount of content so it is easy to see at a glance where the most content is. Hope this goes some way to addressing your dissatisfaction Mr Anonymous! Hope to hear from you again.
|